Electronic Crossmatching

References 

1. Ottenberg R. Transfusion and the question of intravascular agglutination. J. Exp. Med. 1911;13:425–438
   • CrossRef
2. Boral LI, Henry JB. The type and screen: a safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedures. Transfusion. 1977;17:163–168
3. BCSH . Guidelines for compatibility testing in hospital blood banks. In:  Roberts B editors. Standard haematology practice. Oxford: Blackwell; 1989;p. 150–163
4. Friedman BA, Oberman HA, Chadwick AR, et al. The maximum surgical blood order schedule and the surgical blood use in the United States. Transfusion. 1976;16:380–387
5. AABB . In:  Schmidt PJ editors. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 11:Arlington, USA: AABB; 1984;
6. Milkins CE, Chapman JF, Knowles S, et al. Omission of the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) crossmatch. Is the direct agglutination test a good enough alternative?. Transfusion. 1999;39:(Suppl 95S)
7. Oberman HA, Barnes BA, Steiner EA. Role of the crossmatch in testing for serologic incompatibility. Transfusion. 1982;22:12–16
8. Oberman HA, Barnes BA, Friedman BA. The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion. Transfusion. 1978;18:137–141
9. Lamberson RD, Boral LI, Berry-Dortch S. Limitations of the crossmatch for detection of incompatibility between A₂B red blood cells and B patient sera. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1986;86:511–513
   • MEDLINE
10. Judd WJ, Steiner EA, O'Donell DB, et al. Discrepancies in reverse ABO typing due to prozone: How safe is the immediate-spin crossmatch?. Transfusion. 1988;28:334–338
11. Chapman JF, Milkins C, Voak D. The computer crossmatch: A safe alternative to the serological crossmatch. Transfus. Med. 2000;10:251–256
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
12. Butch SH, Judd WJ, Steiner EA. Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: The computer cross-match. Transfusion. 1994;34:105–109
13. Butch SH, Judd WJ. Experience with the electronic crossmatch: Errors and suggested improvements. Transfusion. 1995;35:(Suppl 24S, abstract)
14. Chan A, Chan JC, Wong LY, et al. From maximum surgical blood ordering schedule to unlimited computer crossmatching: Evolution of blood transfusion for surgical patients at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Transfus. Med. 1996;6:121–124
    • MEDLINE
15. Safwenberg J, Högman CF, Cassemar B. Computerized delivery control—a useful and safe complement to the type and screen compatibility testing. Vox. Sang. 1997;72:162–168
    • MEDLINE
16. Georgsen J, Kristensen T. From serological to computer crossmatching in nine hospitals. Vox. Sang. 1998;74:419–425(Suppl 2)
    • CrossRef
17. Cox C, Enno A, Deveridge S. Remote electronic release blood system. Transfusion. 1997;37:960–964
18. Klein HG. (ed): AAAB. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services (Standards), (ed 17). Bethesda, American Association of Blood Banks 1996, 15.100; 15.120; 33.
19. British Committee for Standardization in Haematology , Blood Transfusion Task Force . Guidelines for pretransfusion compatibility. Procedures in blood transfusion laboratories. Transfus. Med. 1996;6:273–283
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
20. College of American Pathologists: Transfusion medicine (comprehensive) and educational challenge participant summary report J-C, 2001 I.I. Northfield, pp 13-14.
21. Engelfriet CP, Reesink HW. The use of computer crossmatch. Vox. Sang. 2001;80:184–192
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
22. Butch SH, Judd WJ. Requirements for the computer crossmatch (letter). Transfusion. 1994;34:187
23. Ashford P, Gozzard D, Jones J, et al. Guidelines for blood bank computing. Transfus. Med. 2000;10:307–314
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
24. Butch S. Computerization in transfusion service. Vox. Sang. 2002;83:105–110(Suppl 1)
    • CrossRef
25. Hemosoft AO. A new software for blood bank and apheresis management. Transfus. Apheresis Sci. 2004;30:193–196