Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 259-272, October 2006

Testing for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibodies

  • Theodore E. Warkentin

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Theodore E. Warkentin, MD, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, General Site, 237 Barton St. E., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8L 2X2.
  • ,
  • Jo-Ann I. Sheppard

Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a distinct clinical profile and unique pathogenesis. It is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Although an immune response to PF4/heparin associated with heparin treatment is very common, clinical HIT occurs only among the minority of patients whose antibodies are capable of strongly activating platelets. This explains why certain platelet activation assays and anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT and why diagnostic specificity is highest for those assays that preferentially detect pathogenic antibodies, such as the washed platelet activation assays or immunoassays that detect only IgG antibodies. Negative results obtained in a solid-phase PF4/polyanion immunoassay generally exclude HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. In addition, because the magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT, a Bayesian diagnostic approach that combines pretest probability and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended. Recent studies suggest that presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in certain clinical settings confers an adverse prognosis, even without clinically evident HIT. Whether such antibodies impart “forme fruste” HIT or are simply a surrogate marker for a non-HIT adverse risk factor such as inflammation is unresolved.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Some of the work described in this article was supported from 1993 until the present by operating grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (A2449, T2967, B3763, T4502, T5207).

PII: S0887-7963(06)00029-0

doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2006.05.001

Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 259-272, October 2006