Increasing Patient Safety and Efficiency in Transfusion Therapy Using Formal Process Definitions

References 

1. Linden JV, Wagner K, Voytovich AE, et al. Transfusion errors in New York state: An analysis of 10 years' experience. Transfusion. 2000;40:1207–1213
2. Callum JL, Kaplan HS, Merkley LL, et al. Near-miss event reporting for transfusion medicine: Improving transfusion safety. Transfusion. 2001;41:1204–1211
3. General OoI. Reporting process for blood establishments to notify the Food and Drug Administration of Errors and Accidents Affecting Blood. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1995. Report No.: CIN:A-03-93-00352.
4. Mintz P. Quality assessment and improvement of transfusion practices. Transfus Med. 1995;9:219–232
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Kaplan H, Callum J, Fastman B, et al. The medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine: Will it help get the right blood to right patient. Transfus Med Rev. 2000;16:86–102
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (1453 KB)
   • CrossRef
6. Battles JB, Kaplan HS, Van der Schaaf TW, et al. The attributes of medical event reporting systems for transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122:231–238
   • MEDLINE
7. Rebibo D, Hauser L, Slimani A, et al. The French haemovigilance system: Organization and results for 2003. Transfus Apheresis Sci. 2004;31:145–153
8. Berte L. Tools for improving quality in the transfusion service. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:S36–S42(4 Suppl 1)
   • MEDLINE
9. Galel S, Richards C. Practical approaches to improve laboratory performance and transfusion safety. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:S43–S49(4 Suppl 1)
   • MEDLINE
10. Voak D, Chapman J, Phillips P. Quality of transfusion practice beyond the blood transfusion laboratory is essential to prevent ABO-incompatible death. Transfus Med. 2000;10:95–96
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
11. Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982;
12. Sondheimer NK. Final report: Application of process modeling to online license renewal: Electronic enterprises institute. Amherst (MA): University of Massachusetts; 2002;
13. Malone TW, Lai K-Y, Fry C. Experiments with Oval: A radically tolerable tool for cooperative work. In: In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November 01-04, CSCW '92). New York: ACM Press; 1992;p. 289–297
14. Cass AG, Osterweil LJ. Design guidance through the controlled application of constraints. In: Tenth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design; San Diego, CA. 2000;
15. Cass AG, Sutton SM, Osterweil LJ. Formalizing rework in software processes. In: Ninth European Workshop on Software Process Technology. Helsinki, Finland: Springer-Verlag; 2003;p. 16–31
16. Kaplan HS, Battles JB, Van der Schaaf TW, et al. Identification and classification of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion. 1998;38:1071–1081
17. Baele PL, Debruyere M, Deneys V, et al. Bedside transfusion errors. A prospective survey by the Belgium SAnGUIS Group. Vox Sanuinis. 1994;66:117–121
18. Linden JV, Paul B, Dressler KP. A report of 104 transfusion errors in New York state. Transfusion. 1992;32:601–606
19. Sharma PR, Kumar S, Agnihotri SK. Sources of preventable errors related to transfusion. Vox Sanuinis. 2001;81:37–41
20. Murphy WG, McClelland DBL. Deceptively low morbidity failure to practice safe blood transfusion: An analysis of serious blood transfusion errors. Vox Sanuinis. 1989;57:59–62
21. Sazama K. Reports of 355 transfusion associated deaths: 1976-1985. Transfusion. 1990;30:583–590
22. Novis DA, Miller KA, Howanitz PJ, et al. Audit of transfusion procedures in 660 hospitals: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of patient identification and vital sign monitoring frequencies in 16494 transfusions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:541–548
23. Williamson L, Cohen H, Love E, et al. The serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative. The UK approach to hemovigilance. Vox Sang. 2000;78:291–295
24. Myhre BA, McReur D. Human error—A significant cause of transfusion mortality. Transfusion. 2000;40:879–885
25. Lumadue JA, Boyd JS, Ness PM. Adherence to a strict specimen labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens. Transfusion. 1997;37:1169–1172
26. Rouger PH, Noizat PF, Le P, et al. Hemovigilance and transfusion safety in France. Vox Sang. 2000;78:287–289
27. Michlig C, Vu DH, Wasserfallen JB, et al. Three years of haemovigilance in a General University Hospital. Transfus Med. 2003;13:63–72
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
28. Foss ML, Moore SB. Evolution of quality management: Integration of quality assurance functions into operations, or “quality is everyone's responsibility”. Transfusion. 2003;43:1330–1336
29. Burgmeier J. Failure mode and effect analysis: An application in reducing risk in blood transfusion. Qual Improvement. 2002;28:331–339
30. Turner C, Casbard A, Murphy M. Barcode technology: It's role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion. Transfusion. 2003;43:1200–1209
31. Davies A, Staves J, Kay J, et al. End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: Strengths and weaknesses. Transfusion. 2006;46:352–364
32. Jensen NJ, Crosson JT. An automated system for bedside verification of the match between patient identification and blood unit identification. Transfusion. 1996;36:216–221
33. Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, et al. Building a better delivery system: A new engineering/health care partnership. National Academies Press; 2005;
34. Cass AG, Lerner BS, McCall EK, et al. Little-JIL/Juliette: a process definition language and interpreter. In: International Conference on Software Engineering; 2000 4-11 June; Limerick, Ireland. 2000;p. 754–758
35. Katsh E, Osterweil L, Sondheimer NK. Process technology for achieving government online dispute resolution. In: National Conference on Digital Government Research; 2004 May; Seattle, WA. 2004;
36. Ellison AM, Osterweil LJ, Hadley JL, et al. Analytic webs support the synthesis of ecological datasets. To appear in Ecology 2006
37. Cobleigh JM, Clarke LA, Osterweil LJ. Verifying properties of process definitions. In:  Harrold MJ editors. ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis; 2000 August 21-24. Portland, OR: ACM Press; 2000;p. 96–101
38. Dwyer MB, Clarke LA, Cobleigh JM, et al. Flow analysis for verifying properties of concurrent software systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 2004;13:359–430
39. Wise A. Little-JIL 1.0 Language Report. Technical Report. Amherst, MA: Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts: Amherst; 1998 April. Report No. UM-CS-1998-24
40. Institute of Medicine . A new health system for the 21st century: Crossing the quality chasm. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001;