« Previous
Next »
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Volume 22, Issue 4
, Pages 291-299
, October 2008
Designing Property Specifications to Improve the Safety of the Blood Transfusion Process
References
- . A new health system for the 21st century: Crossing the quality chasm. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001;
- Near-miss event reporting for transfusion medicine: Improving transfusion safety. Transfusion. 2001;41:1204–1211
- . Reporting process for blood establishments to notify the Food and Drug Administration of errors and accidents affecting blood. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1995;[Report No.: CIN:A-03-93-00352]
- . Quality assessment and improvement of transfusion practices. Transfus Med. 1995;9:219–232
- The Medical Event Reporting system for transfusion medicine: Will it help get the right blood to right patient. Transfus Med Rev. 2000;16:86–102
- The attributes of Medical Event Reporting systems for transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122:231–238
- The French Haemovigilance System: Organization and results for 2003. Transfus Apheresis Sci. 2004;145–153
- . Tools for improving quality in the transfusion service. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:S36–S42[4 Suppl 1]
- . Practical approaches to improve laboratory performance and transfusion safety. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:S43–S49[4 Suppl 1]
- . Quality of transfusion practice beyond the blood transfusion laboratory is essential to prevent ABO-incompatible death. Transfus Med. 2000;10:95–96
- Increasing patient safety and efficiency in transfusion therapy using formal process definitions. Transfus Med Rev. 2007;21:49–57
- . Out of the crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1982;
- Analyzing processes for E-government development: The emergence of process modeling languages. J E-Government. 2004;1:63–89
- . Experiments with oval: A radically tolerable tool for cooperative work. In: CSCW'92. New York: ACM; 1992;p. 289–297
- . Design guidance through the controlled application of constraints. In: Tenth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design. San Diego, CA: ACM and IEEE Computer Society; 2000;p. 195–199
- . Formalizing rework in software processes. In: Oquenda F editors. Ninth European Workshop on Software Process Technology; 2003 September. Vol 2786, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Helsinki, Finland: Springer-Verlag; 2003;p. 16–31
- Little-JIL/Juliette: a process definition language and interpreter. In: International Conference on Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland: ACM and IEEE Computer Society; 2000;p. 754–758
- Making healthcare safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001;
- . A series on patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1272–1274
- Identification and classification of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion. 1998;38:1071–1081
- Bedside transfusion errors. A prospective survey by the Belgium SAnGUIS Group. Vox Sang. 1994;66:117–121
- . A report of 104 transfusion errors in New York State. Transfusion. 1992;32:601–606
- . Sources of preventable errors related to transfusion. Vox Sanuinis. 2001;81:37–41
- . Human error—A significant cause of transfusion mortality. Transfusion. 2000;40:879–885
- . Reports of 355 transfusion associated deaths: 1976-1985. Transfusion. 1990;30:583–590
- Audit of transfusion procedures in 660 hospitals: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of patient identification and vital sign monitoring frequencies in 16494 transfusions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:541–548
- The Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) initiative. The UK approach to hemovigilance. Vox Sang. 2000;78:291–295
- . Adherence to a strict specimen labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens. Transfusion. 1997;37:1169–1172
- . Hemovigilance and transfusion safety in France. Vox Sanguinis. 2000;78:287–289
- Three years of haemovigilance in a general university hospital. Transfus Med. 2003;13:63–72
- . Evolution of quality management: integration of quality assurance functions into operations, or “quality is everyone's responsibility”. Transfusion. 2003;43:1330–1336
- . Failure mode and effect analysis: An application in reducing risk in blood transfusion. Quality Improvement. 2002;28:331–339
- . Barcode technology: It's role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion. Transfusion. 2003;43:1200–1209
- End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses. Transfusion. 2006;46:352–364
- . An automated system for bedside verification of the match between patient identification and blood unit identification. Transfusion. 1996;36:216–221
- BEST Research Collaborative. Prevention of Bedside Errors in Transfusion Medicine (PROBE-TM) study: A cluster-randomized, matched-paired clinical areas of a simple intervention to reduce errors in the pretransfusion bedside check. Transfusion. 2007;47:771–780
- . New technology for transfusion safety. Br J Haematol. 2007;136:181–190
- Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. National Academies Press; 2005;
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. CCF-0427071, the US Army Research Office under Award No. DAAD19-01-1-0564, and the US Department of Defense/Army Research Office under Award No. DAAD19-03-1-0133. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the US Army Research Office, or the US Department of Defense/Army Research Office.
PII: S0887-7963(08)00042-4
doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.05.006
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Volume 22, Issue 4
, Pages 291-299
, October 2008
